I, for one, will remember his self serving biblical exegesis. Daniel McClellan has been expertly pushing back on Charlie’s interpretation of bible passages and exposing Charlie’s’ rhetorical goals behind them.
Daniel’s mission is to popularize the scholarly consensus about biblical passages. For instance, he points out that the Sodom and Gomorrah story is NOT about condemning homosexuality but it’s about inhospitality. He points out various inaccurate translations. For instance, the famous first lines of the Gospel of John. It should be “and the word was divine “ not “and the word was god”.
Check out his videos on most of the major platforms. He responds directly to Kirk’s videos.
Very good, Joe. I’ll share it.
Steve,
Kind of you to take note. I hope all is well.
Troubled times for us all.
Regs,
JW
I, for one, will remember his self serving biblical exegesis. Daniel McClellan has been expertly pushing back on Charlie’s interpretation of bible passages and exposing Charlie’s’ rhetorical goals behind them.
Joe, thanks for taking note. I'm not familiar with McClellan's comments. Can you share some for me and other readers here?
Daniel’s mission is to popularize the scholarly consensus about biblical passages. For instance, he points out that the Sodom and Gomorrah story is NOT about condemning homosexuality but it’s about inhospitality. He points out various inaccurate translations. For instance, the famous first lines of the Gospel of John. It should be “and the word was divine “ not “and the word was god”.
Check out his videos on most of the major platforms. He responds directly to Kirk’s videos.
Here’s a taste: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWB_lNUk0Go
Joe,
Thx!
JW